“It can be argued
that “real” reflective practice needs another person as mentor or professional
supervisor, who can ask appropriate questions to ensure that the reflection
goes somewhere, and does not get bogged down in self-justification, self-
indulgence or self-pity!” (Atherton, 2005, reflective practice, Para 3).
It is rightly said that ‘man is a
social animal’. The same is true for learning in life. Human beings learn in
the society because community is the source of reflection for each of us.
Learning cannot be imagined in isolation. The socio-constructivist viewpoint
claims that learning is a social process. Individuals actively construct
knowledge in a social environment by interacting with people around them,
especially those more knowledgeable others. (Bruner, 1996; Vygotsky, 1978)
Therefore I would like to say that
I agree with the above statement. The easy and appropriate way of reflection is
to take help from your peer, supervisor, mentor or even students. Self
reflection often misguides due to our nature or ego. J. Ruan (2005) finds in a study that
reflection is a social as well as an individual act. A supportive virtual
environment with opportunities for constant and consistent social interaction
facilitates reflection. In brief, the views of others are valuable and can
acknowledge a teacher his weaknesses or limitations.
I would like to recall a session of
Geography in which I taught about ‘Time’. My reflection on the session was that
my students followed the lesson well. It was an interesting activity for them
as they got the opportunity to solve problem during the session. The only
limitation that I noticed that I did arrange for them the required number of
problem to illustrate the topic.
I receive reflection on the same
from my students and supervisor. It was that even my supervisor faced the
difficulty to go along my topic. One of the students asked me to explain the
topic again. There suggestions were different from mine. They were of the view
that I should use some teaching aids to introduce the topic. The reason of
difference in time should be explained. The session should be divided into two
sessions as the content was complex.
To conclude, the true reflection
comes from different spheres.
Bruner, J. (1996). The
culture of education. Harvard University Press. Retrieved from: http://www.kmel-journal.org/ojs/index.php/online-publication/article/view/144/114
Ruan, J., & Beach, S.A. (2005). Using online peer dialogue journaling to promote reflection in
elementary pre-service teachers. Action in Education, 27(3), 64-75.
Retrieved from: http://www.kmel-journal.org/ojs/index.php/online-publication/article/view/144/114
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind
in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. Retrieved from: http://www.kmel-journal.org/ojs/index.php/online-publication/article/view/144/114
No comments:
Post a Comment